Cut and run?

An interesting comment from Emanual prompted me to consider again whether adoption is inevitably corrupt. I’ve been devouring material in the past few months trying to understand how corruption occurs and whether it’s possible to have an ethical adoption. I’m certain that ethical adoptions occur, so I don’t believe the answer is to cut and run. I think the answer is for us as PAPs to both be proactive in seeing that our agencies are ethical and for us to make sure that we ourselves behave ethically.

We all need to stand up for integrity in adoption. Check out your agency either before you sign, or if you’re already with them, check them out now. This is extremely difficult work – you are never going to get adequate information – at some point you’re going to have to make a judgment call and rely on your instincts. Ask your agency the hard questions – don’t rely on an assumption that someone else must have asked the questions before you.  Demand answers to these hard questions.  Don’t let yourself be fed rhetoric that any agency could give you.  If you don’t get the answers you need on your first phone call.  Call again.  The agency should not get frustrated at the fact that you’re checking them out.

If you’re able, do a docket search for litigation against your agency. I checked many, and believe me (or don’t – do your own research), there are a lot of cases that have been filed against agencies on the so-called “approved list.” On certain boards, you will see one civil case against one agency cited time after time, as if it is the only salient piece of litigation out there. This case has yet to be decided, and could simply be based on groundless accusations, but it is treated as if it were a decision from the US Supreme Court condemning this agency. But, two considerations about litigation. First, do not assume that just because a case is filed against an agency that the claims made in that case are true – this is America, and we use our civil courts not only for justice but also for satisfying our vendettas. And second, do not assume that just because you hear no references of litigation against the agencies that are considered to be ethical that there is no such litigation. You’d be surprised.

Look at Guide Star for details on both your agency and their charitable foundation (almost all have them). See where the money goes. Understand how corporations work. There’s been a lot on the boards about the “greedy agencies” just wanting to get more clients in the door for fees. But the factor a lot of people seem to forget is that these are NON-profit corporations. These agencies aren’t distributing dividends to their stockholders, they’re not making a profit. The employees in my agency are not well paid and they’re not picking up extra on the charitable foundation side. I’ve checked. The only way they’re pocketing any real money is if they are siphoning off the international fees or getting kick backs from corrupt facilitators. Show me where that is occurring and I’ll do more than point my fingers at them, but until I have something looking like proof, I will not.

We live in a culture where the mere mention of the word “corporation” gets people in a lather. But, people, these are not the oil companies we detest so much. These are agencies whose sole purpose is to find families for children without them. That is what adoption is about. It’s not about you or me or our desire to have a child. It’s not about the fact that you may have been trying to get pregnant for 10 years. It’s about orphans who have a bleak future, who are possibly malnourished and languishing in orphanages in countries that experience poverty at a level you and I cannot understand. It’s about finding homes for children who, if not adopted, are going to be cast aside from the orphanage around age 15, left to fend for themselves in countries that don’t even have the limited safety net we have here. So, do I think we give up on adoption? No way.

My desire to adopt was formed when I was a child. There are millions of children in this world who need families, and I truly believe that those of us who are capable have a responsibility to take care of them. However, there are evil people in this world, people who will prey on those desperate to have a family, who are willing to buy or steal children for a fee. Soon after countries open to international adoption, these monsters come out of the woodwork; that seems to be the cycle. But, I don’t think that these people play a part in the majority of adoptions. I believe they’re fairly rare, but once they’re discovered, we jump to the conclusion that this is the typical behavior. To make that leap, though, I think we have to assume that most people are evil, which I will not do. These people certainly exist, but I will not let them keep me from giving a child a future. Will I adopt from Vietnam? I certainly hope so, but it will be in an ethically sound way. Once I understood more about the gender issue, I became open to either gender (and how crazy was it that I wasn’t before?). I’m going to continue to think critically throughout the process. I’m not going to turn a blind eye to questionable paperwork, ignore red flags or engage in questionable behavior. I believe that if I do, I become complicit in this corruption. That’s just not going to happen.

November 10, 2007 - Posted by | accountability, Adoption, corruption, personal responsibility, Vietnam

6 Comments »

  1. Like the post. I have many of the same feelings. Finger pointing and name calling does nothing for the adoption cause. Level-headed, critical thinking is way more productive.

    Comment by mama2be | November 10, 2007 | Reply

  2. Thanks for the response. :) I appreciate your post. V. level headed!

    Comment by Emanual | November 10, 2007 | Reply

  3. I hope you don’t mind me posting twice . . . I’ve thought more about your post – which concentrated on how to check out agencies.

    I think that article really opened my eyes to (1) how a country that has a strong human trafficking trade, for labor and sex, won’t blink an eye at incorporating human trafficking for adoption into their agenda – so for these countries, their orphan population is actually smaller (and better off) when the foreign money is NOT in the equation and (2) that the way this trafficking is accomplished can be/is done without any knowledge or involvement from agencies. Ethical agencies can adopt out traffficked children without even knowing it. So, nothing about the agency . . . all about the sending country.

    VN, from what I can tell by some (fairly quick) internet research has a sizeable human trafficking problem . . . so I can see how this would lead to an inevitable erosion of the legitamacy of the adoption pool.

    That said, I definately got myself all the way twisted around in my thinking . . . saying, “My God! How is it better for these children (especially the girls!) to grow up and be subjected to trafficking for prostitution, wives, labor or all of the above. I know that is not considered “right” thinking, and I know that the trafficked individuals are a small percentage of the population . . . just saying when I immersed myself in the reality (the murkiness) of all this, it didn’t take long to get lost . . . :) Man, it is so tough.

    I guess that my own personal area of “hang up” right now is – am I contributing to human trafficking . . . me, not my agency . . .me.

    The upside to these articles you posted, and other ones they drove me to, showed me that it will take a lot to really get a NOID that can’t be overturned and/or to shut down a the program. If we (the US) can stomach Guatamala . . . VN is a small slice of the pie. It sounded to me (upon very quick readings) that some of the worst part of the Cambodian and Indian situations were the physical human rights violations (severe neglect, even to the point of death) as well as allowing older children (who could tell their stories) to be trafficked/laundered. If VN can keep the level of care in their orphanages to an acceptable standard, and the babes are all too young to talk . . . I can’t see what reason either side would have to shut down the program.

    Cynical . . . but realistic.

    Again, thanks. I’d be interested to hear any thoughts you have on any of these things.

    Comment by Emanual | November 10, 2007 | Reply

  4. I think this is an excellent post, with great advice on selecting an agency. I have been struggling with these issues, but I agree, we don’t give up on adoption.

    Comment by S. | November 12, 2007 | Reply

  5. Hi Emanual. I thought I was cynical! Personally, I can’t make the leap to being as fatalistic as you. The reason I keep focusing on the things we as PAPs can do is because, realistically, I think that’s all we can do (aside from lobbying our government to hold both our agencies and the governments of sending countries to the standards that have already been put in place).

    Is there a significant human trafficking problem in VN? I simply do not know. Quite frankly, I don’t even know the extent of the corruption in VN adoptions (I don’t think any of us do). I agree that it is probably those in the sending nations who are more incentivized to engage in this behavior (not the agencies here, nor the government in the sending countries). I also don’t know if there’s any cross-over between those willing to sell women into the sex trade and those willing to sell babies. I was wary of linking to that particular law review article for a few reasons, one of which was the fatalistic tone. The article really leads one to believe that there isn’t much of a chance that any adoption could be done without corruption (at least when a country has already devolved to the point there’s corruption, like Guatemala). I don’t believe that is the case. I simply think we need to be careful in how we go about doing this.

    Comment by Michelle | November 12, 2007 | Reply

  6. thanks Michelle – I appreciate your participation in the discussion. I enjoy your blog. Emanual. :)

    Comment by Emanual | November 12, 2007 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.